Tuesday, June 29, 2010
Monday, June 28, 2010
Faeries!
Hey everyone!
I went to the NYS Faerie festival this weekend and it was AWESOME!! What is better than dressing up and pretending you are a faerie all day....???
Anyway, when I was checking over the coding work I did for Sally, I noticed some inconsistencies that caused us to rethink things and become quite confused as to the differences between certain cognitive and emotional self disclosures in Facebook status updates. I think we are going to ask everyone in the group at next week's meeting what their opinions are on the issue... so basically I had to go back and look over ALL of the data, which took quite a while.
I have Jeff's smile experiment set up on one of the lab computers, and need people to smile for me! If you are free at all this week, come into the lab and be a part of the experiment! (It literally takes 2 minutes, tops).
Now that I have created a list of deception books for Jeff to buy, we need to write the Market/Competition part of his book proposal!
Well.... off to writing!
Crystal
Conducting Interviews
Other than that, I've transcribed more interviews and am finishing up the anonymizations of existing interviews. Also, the potluck was delicious!
In other random news, it's 83% humid outside. Walking up West Campus and then the Slope was not fun this morning.
Getting Ready
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
Dancing Baby Doing The Samba In Brazil - geekdrop.com
Happy Tuesday morning!
(even though I was supposed to post this entry yesterday!)
I'm still basically working on the same stuff: books for Jeff and still trying to finish Sally's coding. Kayaking on Thursday was awesome! All of you party poopers who didn't come should definitely start coming to the Thursday activities... or if you can't make Thursday, think of another day and other cool things to do!
Hope everyone has a great week! :)
another week!
This past week I've been working on collecting top cited/most read articles and books for the Oxford Bibliography Online. I have over 200 articles related to CMC now! I have a couple more searches to do and then I am going to start writing 2-3 sentence descriptions for a few of the books.
Later today, the undergrads in the lab and I are attending this event about "How We Think: The Transforming Power of Digital Technologies":
http://www.cornell.edu/events/profile.cfm?id=35447
It should be interesting! I also had a lot of fun kayaking and I am looking forward to the next activity (I might not be able to attend this week's activity, as I am going away for the weekend).
Monday, June 21, 2010
Kayaking and More
Moving Along
June 21
Also this past week I went Kayaking! There's always a first time for everything. And this was mine. Poppy went with me; which I'm not surprised since she is so great. The next morning my arms felt like dead weight, BUT thats okay since I had so much fun. Also, I spent this past weekend visiting my Uncle in Jersey and he took to New York City (First time too)! So overall, I am very content in how my summer is shaping.
Not much difference
For this week, we are planning to start coding the data using the coding scheme that we created and hopefully finish analyzing all the chat data as well.
Professor Hancock asked to plan this week’s “column B” activity after I suggested we switch up the times a little bit. Those of us in the lab this morning realized we didn’t have an afternoon this week where the majority of us could get together so someone suggested we get lunch instead. We’re planning on heading over to Synapses (the “new” cafĂ© in the biotech building across the street) around noon on Thursday; hope you can join us!
Thursday, June 17, 2010
more ideas for those "column B" activities...
Wednesday, June 16, 2010
Tuesday, June 15, 2010
Weekly Update!
Monday, June 14, 2010
A couple of the other undergrads and I just got back from a data analysis workshop. If you were there (or would have liked to have been) you can access my notes via Google docs here.
Last week I continued transcribing interviews and began to analyze them. The importance of trust resonates through the interviews and this trust tends to be fostered by two factors: collaborator expertise and collaborator commitment. Technology appears to impede two other important collaborative components that participants identified: spontaneous interaction and the ability to see the project’s “big picture.” It’s not surprising that one of the biggest themes is the importance of face-to-face interaction, especially during the beginning stages on a project.
I’ve also continued to update and improve the spreadsheets containing the survey data we have from four surveys conducted over two collaborator retreats.
I was bummed that I couldn’t make our “column B” activity on Thursday. While walking home on Thursday I realized that the rather abstract moniker we’ve given our lab excursions supports an observation Wegner makes in his chapter on transactive memory. Wegner describes the transactive encoding of group information, writing that “whatever label is applied first, perhaps arbitrarily, becomes the catchword for the item…individuals are more inclined to remember items as discussed than items as perceived.”
call for ideas!
For my post this week I'm going to pose a question in hopes that some (or all!) of you respond with ideas.
Jeff & I are in the process of creating a list of objectives for the lab. Since many undergraduates spend a large portion of their semesters doing research in this space, we'd like to have a concrete list of tools, theories & knowledge that alumni of the lab can walk away with. Think of it like a syllabus of sorts; we'll have key articles that should be read, theories to teach & skills to instill. By the end of the "class" (er, research), the student can say "I know that!"
You're all smart undergrads. And though none of you are doing your current work for credit, many of you have, or know others that have. So tell me, why would a student choose to participate in research instead of a class? When you applied for the position that you have now, why did you? What were you expecting to get from this experience?
And along similar lines, after a couple weeks in, have your expectations been met?
What are some guidelines or procedures (using syllabus lingo here) that may make the experience better? More educational?
In the coming weeks we'll be laying out goals & expectations for the students that receive credit for research. Any ideas that you have for the design & implementation are much appreciated.
(feel free to comment on this post, or create your own post in response)
Progress
Organized more text chat data for the video game analysis, and now on to the audio chat data. Also, Lindsay finished transcribing all the audio chat data as well. (Finding it quite difficult to go through the audio chat data because it has to be in sync with the game screenshot video in order for me to properly analyze it.) In addition, we went through several rounds of testing out the data coding scheme using the text chat transcripts and managed to refine it further.
For this week, we (hopefully) expect to begin coding the data using the scheme.
I have been working on the list of deception books for Jeff, and now need to go through the books to try to get a sense of different categories they might fall into. Part of the book proposal for Jeff's book is a "Primary Positioning" section where you lay out the other types of similar books already on the market and where the proposed book falls in comparison. So, now that I have a decent-sized collection of deception books sitting in the lab, I can start to group the books into different categories (academic, popular, etc.).
I still need to finish up coding for Sally, but we are still waiting on some of the translations. Some of the Spanish translations came in, but they weren't very good and seemed as if someone plugged the status update into a junky online translator and copied and pasted the results into the google doc...
So this week, I am hoping to finish up the coding (if we get translations), work on the books, and whatever else comes up :)
Saturday, June 12, 2010
Making Progress
- Many people have mentioned what I like to call a "lack of altruism." In other words, no one collaborates just to help someone else out. There has to be motivation from both parties and mutual benefit.
- Even with all the communication technology we have today, most people have mentioned that face to face meetings are still the best way to keep track of progress
- People can't be made or forced to work together for the sake of collaboration. There should be complementary expertise or a gap that needs to be filled.
Friday, June 11, 2010
IRB and Interviews
Thursday, June 10, 2010
Fun things to do
Bonfire! (s'mores, roasted apples, anyone have drums/other instruments so we can make music??)
Trips to local U-pick farms so we can go pick fresh berries and fruit
Granola making (who doesn't love homemade granola??? yes, it takes a little while to bake, but we can do other fun times while waiting)
Baking cookies
Cornell Plantations
....
(late) post
I'm currently a member of the following project teams. For each, we're addressing the following questions:
Research-Oriented Virtual Organizations. How do they emerge? How are they sustained? How can we make them more effective? Very interesting project. I am a big proponent of facilitating collaboration & community between people from near & far.
Digital Deception: Jeff's first book. What other deception books are on the market? Which niche will his fill? How can we supplement his manuscript so the publishers get the best possible sense of his work? What will be most interesting tidbits to put on the supplemental website? Another cool project. The last book I helped with was a book on film that Tim Murray finished during the fall of my senior year. I did the indexing and proofs. Glad to be back in the conceptual stages of a new book.
I will also be:
-Training Danielle, so her transition will be as seamless as possible.
-Continuing with Editorial Assistance for Discourse Processes (academic journal of which Jeff is an Editor)
-Working with Jon C. to update pubs, cvs, photos & project descriptions on the lab sites
(Jeff: Idea -- lets have each group write up a description about their summer project & we can post some in the coming weeks)
-Developing a 'syllabus' type deal for the lab... more info. to come (this may be my next post)
-Keeping order with the personnel & scheduling info!
-Possibly working w/ Jeff, Natalie & Cat on the Intention to Lie paper
Plenty to keep me busy! Looking forward to a good summer.
Wednesday, June 9, 2010
Youtube video of photoshopping pics
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YP31r70_QNM&feature=related
Tuesday, June 8, 2010
Poster Project!
Monday, June 7, 2010
Accomplishments thus far/things I am working on
OpenMessenger First Week
- Keyboard Monitor: Works. Needs a longer timer between each input process.
- Microphone Monitor: Works. Needs a new threshold for actually reporting activity, but the differences between real noise and background noise is significant.
- EyeTracker: Unknown. I will be setting up and calibrating the EyeTracker this afternoon with Lindsay.
- Screen Sensor: Works. Needs a monitor written to actually process the data.
- Webcam Sensor: Same as above.
Things we've accomplished so far
I also organized several game text logs using the video data of the game experiments, and Lindsay managed to finish transcribing most of the audio chat data. For this week, we plan to test our new data coding scheme using the transcripts and fix whatever is necessary.
Friday, June 4, 2010
First Few Weeks
Additionally, I've read interview transcripts and done some reading on qualitative data analysis as well as clarified some things with Xuan, a partner on this project who handed over much of her previous work to us.
Finally, I transcribed three of Xuan's interviews and one and a half of Laura's (one of them is currently in progress; I'm tired of having silicone stuffed inside my ears and am taking a break from transcribing). Julia and I also attempted to provide some insight to students taking the summer COMM/INFO 2450 course. Hopefully we didn't just bore them!

Hello All!
Kerwell and I (in conjunction with Ashley, Laura in New York City and Xuan in China) are examining distributed collaboration between faculty and researchers on Cornell's Ithaca campus and doctors at Weill Cornell Medical Center in New York.
This week I received a crash course in ethnographic research methods, brought myself up to date on the previous article published as well as the VOSS proposal.
I read and took notes on all the transcripts of the interviews Laura and Xuan conducted, and transcribed one of Xuan’s interviews.
Finally, I spent some quality time with the survey data collected before and after collaborator retreats held in Ithaca and Scranton, PA. I entered the data into spreadsheets that Xuan had started. This project took me a lot longer than I expected, reinforcing the “doctor’s have terrible handwriting” stereotype. I modified the spreadsheet formatting so they were not only as clear as possible to read but also more conducive to data analysis.
During our project team meeting yesterday I created a rather snazzy list of important dates, long and short term goals, and contact information to guide our work this summer. My upcoming tasks include putting together a codebook and summary tables for the survey data, begin scheduling local interviews, and familiarizing myself with the interview protocol.
Hope everyone has a lovely weekend!